Sample Library
Three real appraisals across the judgment spectrum — from “the evidence doesn't support it” to “grade A, practice-changing.” The tool follows the evidence; it doesn't hold a fixed stance.
ACCORD
BWhen an intuitive intervention fails
See full appraisal
SPRINT
BWhen benefit exists but trade-offs matter
See full appraisal
RECOVERY (dexamethasone)
AWhen evidence changes practice
See full appraisal
Why these three examples?
Together, they show that TrialReviewer can identify strong support, conditional support, and evidence that fails the clinical claim.
| Trial | Appraisal confidence | What it teaches |
|---|---|---|
| RECOVERY (dexamethasone) | A | Strong evidence with a clear subgroup boundary |
| SPRINT | B | Benefit exists, but harms and measurement context matter |
| ACCORD | B | A plausible surrogate target can fail when clinical outcomes and safety move against it |
For illustration only. TrialReviewer appraises evidence quality to inform professional judgment; it is not medical advice, and clinical decisions are made by the clinician.